Gilmer County Circuit Court Report – 10.22.12
Four fugitives from justice were before the Court on Judge Richard A. Facemire‘s motion day, Monday, October 22, 2012.
All 4 were represented by Daniel Armstrong of Gassaway, who was standing in for Daniel Grindo and each waived extradition back to their respective states.
• Daniel McColgan waived to return to Pennsylvania.
• Harold Doss waived to return to Kentucky.
• Rufus Gunn waived to return to Michigan.
• Michael Rickard waived to return to New York.
Authorities in those states have until 4:00 PM on Wednesday, October 31, 2012 to pick these defendants -up or they will be released from Central Regional Jail.
• Stephanie Smarr was before the Court with her court appointed attorney, Christina Flanigan of Buckhannon.
Smarr completed the Anthony Center program so Judge Facemire placed her on 5-years’ probation and ordered her to enroll in and successfully complete NA and AA programs, as well as a substance abuse program.
She also must obtain full time employment and speak to at least 3 high school classes about addiction as part of her sentence.
• Two juvenile cases were dismissed.
• One juvenile was completed.
• One was set for Thursday, December 20, 2012 at 9:00 AM.
• Another was set for Wednesday, October 31, 2012 at 9:00 AM.
• Two more were set for Monday, January 28, 2013 at 9:00 AM.
• Another was set for Monday, January 28, 2013 at 9:15 AM.
• Another was heard without being set for further hearing.
• State of West Virginia vs. Catherine McGhee
The case was denied probation or alternative sentencing and was sentenced to 1-5 in the penitentiary with credit for time served and she must pay court costs within 18 months of her release.
She was represented by Daniel Armstrong.
• State of West Virginia vs. Kevin Curry
He was before the Court for reconsideration of is sentence.
He was represented by Christina Flanigan of Buckhanno and Judge Facemire denied his reconsideration.
• The magistrate case of State of West Virginia vs. Kenneth Greenlief
The case was dismissed.
Greenlief was represented by Daniel Armstrong.
WV Record: May Trial Scheduled for Doddridge EMS Suit
The WV Record Reports:
A paramedic’s personal injury suit against a Doddridge County ambulance service is slated for trial late next spring.
Harrison Circuit Judge Thomas A. Bedell on July 09 set May 28, 2013, for trial to begin in the case of Joseph G. Sadie v. Doddridge County Emergency Squad, Inc. Also, Bedell scheduled, among other things, the previous Tuesday for a pre-trial conference.
In his complaint filed March 01, Sadie alleges he was injured last year when an ambulance driven by Jason Leasure collided with another vehicle in route to United Hospital in Clarksburg. The collision caused the ambulance to overturn resulting in not only Sadie’s injuries, but also the subsequent death of the patient.
According to the suit, Leasure responded to a 911 call on October 02, 2011 to transport William Wiseman to United. The suit does not specify Wiseman’s location in Doddridge County.
Believing he may need an advanced life support system which required the assistance of a paramedic, Leasure, an emergency medical technician, called the 911 center and requested any on-duty Doddridge County Ambulance Authority paramedic provide him the needed assistance. At a time not specified, Sadie met Leasure, and accompanied him to Clarksburg.
According to the suit, Sadie began treating Wiseman. After stabilizing him, Sadie “communicated his vital signs and other information to the trauma team at United Hospital.”
However, the ambulance failed to make it to United as at a time not specified Leasure collided with another vehicle at the intersection of U.S. 50 East and the Interstate 79 South off ramp. The resulting collision caused the ambulance to overturn and slide nearly 100 yards.
According to the suit, the collision also resulted in Wiseman’s death.
In his suit, Sadie accused Leasure, who is named as a co-defendant, of negligently operating the ambulance. Specifically, he accused Leasure of, among other things, “[s]peeding or operating the emergency vehicle at a speed in excess of the conditions then existing…[f]ailing to keep a proper lookout and [o]perating the emergency vehicle in reckless disregard for the safety of others.”
Also, Sadie accused DCEMS of not only failing to properly train and educate Leasure on the proper operation of an ambulance, but also have the necessary equipment available to treat patients. As a result of his injuries, Sadie maintains he’s incurred, among other things, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life, medical and health care bills and a diminished capacity to earn.
Just over a month later, DCEMS and Leasure filed their answer to Sadie’s suit. Though they admitted to most of the allegations including the ambulance overturning following a collision, DCEMS and Leasure denied it was in any way their fault. Instead, they place the blame on Benjamin Gear, the driver of the vehicle Leasure collided with, and named him as a third-party defendant.
In his answer filed April 16, Gear admitted only to being involved in collision, and a resident of Clarksburg. He denied any responsibility for Sadie’s injuries, and filed a cross claim against DCEMS and Leasure.
Sadie is represented by Wheeling attorney Donald J. Tennant Jr., DCEMS and Leasure by Melvin F. O’Brien and Keith R. Huntzinger with Dickie, McCamey and Chilcote’s Wheeling office and Gear by D. Andrew McMunn with Smith, McMunn and Glover in Clarksburg.
Harrison Circuit Court case number 12-C-101
~~ Lawrence Smith - WV Record ~~
Gilmer County Circuit Court Report - 10.10.12
On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 Chief Judge Alsop held his regular monthly motion day.
• Four fugitives from justice waived extradition back to their states.
All 4 were represented by David Karickhoff of Sutton.
Tony Patterson and Jimmy Dozier waived to return to the state of Tennessee, Kareem Thomas waived to return to Ohio and Daquawon Haten waived to return to Michigan.
• Eight juvenile cases were heard, several were set for further review and 2 were dismissed.
• State of West Virginia vs. Matthew Capelety
He was before the Court for reconsideration of sentence heretofore handed down by Judge Alsop.
He was represented by Christopher Moffatt of Charleston and Judge Alsop denied his motion stating he received a favorable plea bargain and other reasons for denying the same.
Gilmer County Family Court Report - 10.10.12
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Family Court Judge Larry Whited came to Gilmer County and presided over Family Court.
• Two domestic violence cases were continued
• One was granted for 1 year
• A guardian ad litem was appointed in the a divorce case and it was rescheduled for Wednesday, December 12, 2012.
• A temporary relief hearing was held in another divorce case.
• One modification of child support was granted.
• One contempt hearing was continued.
Two divorces were granted as follows:
• Phillip E. Moore (75) of Glenville, WV divorced Marcia L. Arman-Moore (67) of Glenville, WV.
• James Greenlief (36) of Glenville, WV divorced Delores Greenlief (52) of Sand Fork, WV.
Massachusetts Woman Enters Plea of Guilty to Traveling to WV to Have Sex with a Minor in Linn
Imprisonment Status: Federal Inmate
||Hads, Carissa Ann
||North Central Regional Jail
Offender Court Order Information
|Court Info Number
||Issuing Agency Location
||US MARSHALL SERVICE/NORTHERN - Bail Amount: $0.00
United States Attorney William J. Ihlenfeld announced that CARISSA HADS, age 25, of Quincy, Massachusetts, entered a plea of guilty on October 10, 2012, in United States District Court in Clarksburg before Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull.
HADS entered a plea of guilty “Traveling in Interstate Commerce with the Intent to Engage in Illicit Sexual Conduct” on February 23, 2012, when HADS traveled from Massachusetts to North Central West Virginia to have sex with a minor.
Court documents indicate that HADS posed as an 18- year old man on a social media website and also took steps to change her appearance in order to deceive the victim as to her true identity.
HADS met the alleged victim online in 2010 and the two communicated for over a year before the first in-person meeting took place.
HADS traveled at least three times from Massachusetts to visit the alleged victim, and was arrested at the Pittsburgh International Airport by F.B.I. agents on May 25, 2012, on one of her visits to the area.
As part of her plea, HADS has agreed to the forfeiture of the computer and electronic equipment seized from her and her residence.
HADS, who is in custody pending sentencing, faces up to 30 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.
The case was be prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Shawn A. Morgan, Chief of the Criminal Division for the U.S. Attorney’s Office and investigated by the West Virginia Internet Crimes Against Children Task Force and the Federal Bureau of Investigation.
G-otcha™: Two FCI-Gilmer Individuals Sentenced on Escape Charge
Two individuals who were convicted on March 22, 2012, by a Clarksburg jury were sentenced on October 05, 2012, in United States District Court in Clarksburg by Judge Irene M. Keeley.
HARVEY BREWER, age 40, an inmate at FCI Gilmer was sentenced to 15 months imprisonment to run concurrent with the 120-month sentence he is currently serving and TASHA SHELEKA SAUNDERS, age 33, of Baltimore, Maryland, was sentenced to 12 months and 1 day imprisonment.
BREWER was convicted of escape and SAUNDERS was convicted of aiding and abetting the escape of BREWER from FCI Gilmer on August 28, 2010, where he was in confined at the direction of the Attorney General upon a conviction in the District of Maryland for the offense of conspiracy to distribute and possess with intent to distribute heroin.
The Court found that both defendants committed extensive perjury when they testified at trial.
BREWER was remanded to the custody of the United States Marshal and SAUNDERS, who is on bond, will self-report to the designated Federal institution on January 11, 2013.
The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Brandon S. Flower and was investigated by the West Virginia State Police-Glenville detachment and the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Federal Bureau of Prisons.
G-otcha™: Shock, WV Resident Enters Plea to Methamphetamine Charge
A 37 year old Shock, West Virginia, resident entered a plea of guilty on October 05, 2012, in United States District Court in Clarksburg before Magistrate Judge John S. Kaull.
United States Attorney William J. Ihlenfeld, II, announced that: DANIEL RAY KING entered a plea of guilty to Possession of Material used in the Manufacture of Methamphetamine on February 01, 2012, in Gilmer County, West Virginia.
KING, who is on bond pending sentencing, faces a maximum exposure of 10 years imprisonment and a $250,000 fine.
The case was prosecuted by Assistant United States Attorney Stephen D. Warner and was investigated by the West Virginia State Police.
CHESAPEAKE APPALACHIA PLEADS GUILTY TO CLEAN WATER ACT VIOLATIONS
Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC (hereinafter “Chesapeake”) entered pleas of guilty today in federal court to three violations of the Clean Water Act related to natural gas drilling activity in Northern West Virginia, according to United States Attorney William Ihlenfeld, II.
Chesapeake pled guilty to three counts of “Unauthorized Discharge into a Water of the United States” in that it discharged sixty (60) tons of crushed stone and gravel into Blake Fork, a water of the United States, on at least three different occasions in December of 2008. Chesapeake also admitted that after discharging the stone and gravel that it then spread the material in the stream to create a roadway for the purpose of improving access to a site associated with Marcellus Shale drilling activity in Wetzel County, West Virginia.
“Our nation’s wetlands play a critical role in maintaining water quality, reducing flood damage, and providing habitat for fish and wildlife,” said David G. McLeod, Jr., Special Agent in Charge of EPA’s criminal enforcement program in West Virginia. “The defendant illegally filled at least three sensitive wetlands; in one instance, obliterating a natural waterfall. This plea agreement demonstrates that those who illegally fill in or destroy these essential natural resources will be prosecuted.”
The plea agreement calls for Chesapeake to pay a fine of $200,000 for each conviction, for a total fine of $600,000. It also requires that Chesapeake be placed onto probation for two years and be under the supervision of the Court during that time period.
Additionally, the parties have agreed that separate violations committed by Chesapeake and occurring in connection with impoundments constructed in Marshall and Wetzel Counties would be addressed by civil penalties and not via criminal charges.
The Clean Water Act, also known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, was enacted by Congress to restore and maintain the integrity of the Nation’s waters. It prohibits the discharge of any pollutant from a point source into the waters of the United States without a permit. Discharges of dredged or fill material into waters of the United States are prohibited unless authorized by a permit issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Chesapeake violated the Clean Water Act when, in 2008, it selected the location for an access road to a site associated with its drilling activities, hired construction contractors to discharge and spread rock and gravel in Blake Fork in order to develop access to the Hohman Pit, and supervised and directed the work of the construction contractors. These contractors hired by Chesapeake discharged gravel from dump trucks into Blake Fork, also known as Blake Run, on at least three separate and distinct occasions.
Chesapeake’s contractors, under the supervision of a Chesapeake employee, subsequently used bulldozers to spread the 60 tons of gravel in Blake Fork to develop access to the Hohman Pit in order to facilitate Marcellus Shale gas drilling activities. Chesapeake failed to obtain a Clean Water Act permit prior to this discharge.
Chesapeake Appalachia, LLC, is a wholly owned subsidiary of Chesapeake Energy Corporation.
The case was investigated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division. It is being prosecuted by David Perri, Assistant United States Attorney.
Doddridge County: Triple Murder Now An Adult Case
A Doddridge County teenager charged in the shooting deaths of his father, mother and younger sister will be tried as adult.
Doddridge County Circuit Court Judge Tim Sweeney transferred the case of Joseph Spencer, age 16, to adult status on Wednesday, October 03, 2012.
Spencer allegedly killed his family on Labor Day.
The defendant, a junior at Doddridge County High School, is facing three counts of first degree murder.
Killed in that shooting were Fred and Dixie Spencer and their 9-year-old daughter Patience.
They were found in their home in West Union on September 03, 2012.
Investigators have never revealed a motive behind the triple-homicide.
In fact, they have released few details into the crime.
Joseph Spencer could face a grand jury as early as this month.
Plea Deal in Works for Massachusetts Woman Who Posed as Boy, Allegedly Had Sex with WV Girl
A Massachusetts woman accused of posing as a 17-year-old boy to prey on a West Virginia girl intends to enter a plea next week in federal court.
U.S. Magistrate John Kaull entered an order Monday scheduling a Wednesday, October 10, 2012 hearing for 25-year-old Carissa Hads of Quincy, MA.
The document says she has entered a plea agreement with the government, but it does not specify details.
Hads’ public defender did not immediately respond to a message seeking comment.
Hads previously pleaded not guilty to one count of traveling in interstate commerce to engage in illegal sexual conduct.
Investigators say Hads pretended to be a 17-year-old boy and began an online relationship with the girl in 2010.
She visited the Linn, West Virginia teen at least three times and had a sexual encounter in February.
Doddridge County: Court Addresses Surface Owner Appeal Rights Involving Marcellus Shale Gas Wells
On September 25, 2012, the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals entertained oral arguments in the case of James Martin, Director v. Matthew L. Hamblet, Docket No. 11-1157.
This appeal arises from a ruling issued by the Circuit Court of Doddridge County, West Virginia, finding in favor of Mr. Hamblet, the owner of the surface of land on which EQT Production Company proposes to drill a horizontal well targeting the Marcellus Shale formation.
EQT was granted a permit by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection (WVDEP) to drill the well on Mr. Hamblet’s property, and the circuit court determined (over the objections of EQT and the WVDEP) that he has the right to appeal that permit in court.
Unlike other environmental/ regulatory programs that typically grant comment and appeal rights to any person who can claim to be “adversely affected” by the issuance of a permit, the statutes in West Virginia governing the issuance of drilling permits for shallow and deep gas wells provide objection and appeal rights only to coal owners and operators who may be affected by the drilling that would take place under such a permit.
Further, the main focus of those types of appeal proceedings is on ensuring the safety of mining operations that may occur in proximity to well drilling or fracturing.
Surface owners, on the other hand, are generally granted the right to comment on permit applications – and such comments must be considered by the WVDEP prior to making a decision on a permit application – but are not vested with the right to object or appeal the issuance of such a permit to any administrative appeals body or otherwise.
Surface owners of land on which a gas well is drilled are, however, granted certain statutory rights to compensation for damages caused by drilling operations undertaken after a permit is issued, in addition to common law rights of action that are specifically preserved by West Virginia statute.
In Hamblet, the Circuit Court of Doddridge County based its determination that a surface owner has a right to appeal a drilling permit on the per curiam (“by the court,” unpublished) decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court in State Ex. Rel. Lovejoy v. Callaghan, issued in 2002. In Lovejoy, the Supreme Court denied a petition for a writ of mandamus filed by a surface owner who sought to force the WVDEP to revoke a previously-issued exploratory deep well permit.
That denial was based on the Court’s finding that a specific provision in the West Virginia gas well statute provided the petitioner in that case with a right to administratively appeal that permit. Because that administrative appeal route had not been pursued, under well-established legal principles a writ of mandamus was deemed to be unavailable to the petitioner.
The Doddridge County Circuit Court’s reliance on Lovejoy, however, is problematic for several reasons.
First, the West Virginia Constitution and applicable jurisprudence dictates that a per curiam decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court has no precedential value and may not be relied upon in establishing a new principle of law.
Second, the opinion in Lovejoy cited an inapplicable provision within the West Virginia gas well permitting statute that, simply stated, does not stand for the proposition for which it was cited.
Third, even if Lovejoy had been properly decided and could be given controlling weight, it addressed a deep well drilling permit.
There is an entirely separate statutory procedure that applies to the issuance and appeals of permits for the drilling of wells into shallow gas formations, and (by definition) the Marcellus Shale formation is considered to be a shallow gas formation.
In allowing four different lawyers (two on each side of the dispute), to make presentations and answer questions, the West Virginia Supreme Court touched on all of these arguments (and others) during oral arguments that were held in the Hamblet appeal on the afternoon of September 25, 2012.
Further, the Court explored with the parties the notion that an owner of surface lands like Mr. Hamblet, who purchased his property rights after the mineral estate had been severed from the surface, should be recognized as having a Constitutional due process right to appeal the issuance of a well drilling permit.
In this regard, some members of the Court expressed varying degrees of sympathy for surface owners like Mr. Hamblet, who are given the right to comment on a proposed permit but may not thereafter appeal its issuance, and who may not be entitled to any royalties from gas production occurring beneath his property.
In the final analysis, however, it appeared that a majority of the Court recognized that this dispute centers on Mr. Hamlet’s real property rights rather than the WVDEP permitting system, and in granting Mr. Hamblet permit appeal rights the circuit court was actually simply enhancing his property rights.
Indeed, if the activities undertaken on the surface of his land pursuant to the WVDEP permit exceed those that EQT is entitled to undertake under the relevant property right conveyances, then regardless of the existence and terms of the permit Mr. Hamlet would have the right to seek injunctive and/other relief in circuit court on that basis.
In addition, the Supreme Court justices seemed to recognize that in order to sustain Mr. Hamlet’s constitutional challenge, the Court would have to strike down much of West Virginia’s oil and gas statutes on the same ground.
Again, though it is always difficult to predict the outcome of an appeal based upon the nature and tenor of oral arguments, it would be quite a surprise if the West Virginia Supreme Court was to affirm the Doddridge County Circuit Court’s opinion on this basis.
A written decision in the Hamblet case (presumably, one that will be published and therefore carry precedential weight) can be expected within the next few months.
Obviously, the outcome of this closely-watched case may have a significant effect on current Marcellus well permitting in West Virginia. Beyond that, the briefing and arguments raised with the Court could conceivably affect future legislative reform efforts, and the Court’s opinion will be worth reading from that perspective as well.
~~ Dinsmore & Shohl LLP ~~
OddlyEnough™: WV Man Says He Killed Girlfriend for Waking Him
Imprisonment Status: Convicted Felon
||Pauley, Eric Brian
||Western Regional Jail
Offender Court Order Information
|Court Info Number
||Issuing Agency Location
||PUTNAM COUNTY COURT - Bail Amount: $0.00
He is sentenced to life in prison after telling a judge he shot and killed his girlfriend last year because she interrupted his sleep.
Fifty-year-old Eric Brian Pauley pleaded guilty to first-degree murder on Friday, September 29, 2012 in Putnam County Circuit Court.
Pauley told Judge Phillip Stowers that he shot 52-year-old Debra Rosiek at their Winfield trailer in September 2011 because he was mad that she woke him up in the middle of the night.
Stowers questioned Pauley’s state of mind during the hearing.
Stowers then accepted a plea agreement that called for Pauley to serve life in prison with the possibility of parole after 15 years.
He already has served more than one year behind bars.
Braxton County Attorney Gets Probation For Embezzlement
The WV Record Reports:
A Braxton County attorney will remain a free man after admitting to embezzling nearly $75,000 from a trust account he was appointed to oversee.
Thomas J. Drake on September 13, 2012 was indicted via information on a single charge of embezzlement. According to the indictment, Drake converted $70,798.57 belonging to the ATS Settlement Trust between July 2009 and August 2011.
No details are provided about the trust, and when Drake was made its trustee. The only other information available is that Drake’s embezzlement of the funds took place in Elkview.
In exchange for agreeing to plead guilty, Assistant Kanawha County Prosecutor Rob Schulenburg offered to recommend Drake get probation for a term to be determined by Judge James C. Stucky. Also, as a condition of his probation, Drake was to make court-ordered restitution.
As of press-time, Stucky’s sentencing order was not available. According to his attorney William C. Forbes, Stucky placed Drake on two years probation.
The amount of restitution, Forbes said, has yet to be recommended by the probation office.
According to the state Bar’s Web site, Drake, 36, is a sole practitioner in Gassaway, WV. He was admitted to the Bar on September 26, 2000.
Kanawha Circuit Court case number 12-F-491
~~ Kyla Asbury -Kanawha Bureau - WV Record ~~
G-otcha™: Gilmer County Man Remains Behind Bars on Multiple Sexual Charges
Imprisonment Status: Pre-Trial Felon
||Hacker, Robert Lee
||Tygart Valley Regional Jail
Offender Court Order Information
|Court Info Number
||Issuing Agency Location
||GILMER COUNTY - Bail Amount: $100,000.00
||GILMER COUNTY - Bail Amount: $0.00
||GILMER COUNTY - Bail Amount: $500.00
||GILMER COUNTY - Bail Amount: $201,000.00
||GILMER COUNTY - Bail Amount: $75,000.00
In a preliminary hearing before Gilmer County Magistrate Carol L. Wolfe on Wednesday, September 26, 2012 charged with on sixty one counts of felony and misdemeanor charges:
• Six counts of second degree sexual assault
• One count of sexual abuse by person of trust
• Four counts of first degree sexual abuse
• One count of sexual abuse by a parent or guardian
• Three counts of child neglect creating risk of injuries
• Forty five counts of sexual abuse by a parent or guardian
• One count of harassing, obscene, or threatening phone calls
• One count of domestic battery
Hacker waived his right to a preliminary hearing on all charges and the cases were sent to the Gilmer County Circuit Court for further proceedings.
Hearing Set in Challenge to WV Vaccination Law
A Pickens High School senior kept out of the classroom over her refusal to get mandatory immunizations may get a chance to argue her case in court later this week.
Randolph County Circuit Court Judge Jaymie Godwin Wilfong has scheduled a hearing for 10:00 AM Friday in Elkins.
Olivia Hudok and father Phil, a retired teacher, sued the county school board and Superintendent James Phares earlier this month, demanding they grant a religious exemption allowing her in school. In the meantime, Olivia is being home-schooled by her dad.
Phares told The Associated Press on Tuesday that the district has filed a motion to dismiss the complaint, arguing the state Department of Health and Human Resources should have been a defendant, and lawsuits against state agencies must be filed in Kanawha County.
The state attorney general’s office has filed two motions as well, district attorney Greg Bailey said. One seeks to intervene in the case, while the other asks the judge to dismiss because it was filed in the wrong county.
The InterMountain of Elkins , which first reported the complaint, says Olivia refused to get Tdap and MCV4 boosters for religious reasons and because of concerns about toxic ingredients. The immunizations are designed to protect against tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis and meningitis.
Under a new state mandate, all seventh- through 12th-graders must have been vaccinated by September 04.
Bailey said Tuesday that three similar lawsuits have been filed around West Virginia — one each in Kanawha, Ohio and Mercer counties. All, he said, should be argued in Kanawha County.
Olivia Hudok was warned September 07 and September 10 that she would be denied admission to the tiny school, where she is one of only three seniors, if she failed to get proof of immunization.
The complaint her father filed says she will “suffer irreparable harm by being denied her fundamental right to an education” and requests an injunction barring the school district from enforcing its plan.
West Virginia and Mississippi, it notes, are the only states that currently don’t recognize religious exemptions regarding vaccinations.
A county health department letter to the Hudoks calls immunization “a public health issue, not a personal freedom issue.“
“It protects everyone in the school systems and the whole community,“ wrote health officer Mary Boyd.
The letter says vaccinations work, in part, through “herd immunity,“ meaning that when a large enough percentage of the population is immune, it prevents the smaller percentage from developing infections.
“Herd immunity only works if a large percentage of the children get the vaccine,“ the letter said. “If that percentage gets lower, we will see the rate of vaccine preventable diseases increase.“
And the “herd” at Pickens High School is small: Phares says there are just 37 students this year, including the three seniors.
If the county prevails in court, he said, it could have potentially negative implications for the school.
Should Olivia Hudok refuse to get vaccinated, the district would consider her a dropout, Phares said. That would compromise the school’s “adequate yearly progress” figures by slashing the graduation rate from the typical 100% to 67%.
“It only takes one who drops out to bushwhack all those ratings,“ he said.
Copyright MMVIII-MMXV The Gilmer Free Press. All Rights Reserved